| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. War update - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: General Windypops Originally by: Dangerously Cheesey Edited by: Dangerously Cheesey on 07/03/2008 22:48:08 Originally by: General Windypops So why are you incapable of taking down their cynojammer? We...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2008.03.07 22:52:00
|
2. War update - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Hrin Edited by: Hrin on 07/03/2008 22:26:49 4 titans in system is pretty epic fights. They won't even leave POS shields without at least 2 ready to DD. oh wow, I hit reply a couple of posts ago. Well you are the big...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2008.03.07 22:39:00
|
3. War update - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: geno effort Well it's kinda slow these days, between the ridiculous cyno jammers combined with 4 titans on grid, fighter blobs, and lag issues it's tough to make progress unless the defenders make a mistake. But time is on o...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2008.03.07 09:30:00
|
4. Goonswarm influence over 0.0 - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Baxalusx We define ourselves through being disliked by idiots, because if people like you hate us, we must be doing something right. How can idiots be disliked by idiots? You just don't make any sense.
- by Ridley Scot - at 2008.03.07 09:06:00
|
5. War update - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Ridley Scot on 07/03/2008 08:41:10 Originally by: Gnulpie Goons are losing because they are not killing BoB fast enough Well, BoB killed a good amount of towers the past days. IAC is internally reorganizing, RA retreated ...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2008.03.07 08:41:00
|
6. When a pos is destroyed and the guns remain - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Venko Trenulo Originally by: TechnoMag Originally by: Lira Lu Unanchoring the structures is a bad change for industry poses of independent industrial corp and alliances. Then I want a pos self-destruct button...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.10.23 09:56:00
|
7. Eastbound and Down - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Ridley Scot on 11/10/2007 04:29:12 Its all MCs fault... They gave you free stuff and you failed to hold it. Now you came back asking for more free stuff. Do you really think that kissing RA and Goon butt will help you actually hold...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.10.11 04:28:00
|
8. Player Concord Operatives? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Free Politics Originally by: EliteSlave Then why not just make it so u cant fire on other players unless war decc'd or aggro timer such as ore thieving? Now that would just make eve boring... Boring? How ab...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.10.07 09:52:00
|
9. CCP when will this crap stop - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ridley Scot on 07/10/2007 06:40:27 Originally by: Tigrelilly PANDEMIC LEGION PLAYER COMPLAINS ABOUT GRIEFING?????!!!??? Shamiz must be proud :D Maybe they should suicide-gank him? -------------------------------...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.10.07 06:39:00
|
10. Empire ganking - why not one more time... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Price Watcher Originally by: Gamesguy Lol what an idiot. Thank you very much, Tard. Originally by: Gamesguy You dont call 3 hours of ratting in 0.0 with the best spawns a penalty? It takes that long to ...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.10.05 09:01:00
|
11. Suicidal ganks CCP do something about it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Balcura Another is if you have small m3 items worth millions of isk (implants come to mind) use a shuttle Shuttle Shuttle 2 and Implants Good luck If thats how you transport your stuff, I hope you dont run o...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.30 01:52:00
|
12. Suicidal ganks CCP do something about it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ridley Scot on 29/09/2007 18:47:11 Originally by: DarkFenix OP thoroughly deserved getting ganked. Tech 1 hauler, enough cargo to make it worthwhile. If it's worth that much, use a transport ship. You've trained for an Itty...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.29 18:45:00
|
13. We the undersigned protest suicide ganking and request changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Giatshi Originally by: Galan Amarias Originally by: Achina Edited by: Achina on 28/09/2007 12:30:53 Originally by: Gamesguy Have you considered making 2 trips instead? Thnx, that's exactly ...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.29 07:46:00
|
14. We the undersigned protest suicide ganking and request changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Liisa Originally by: PauZotoh Zhaan Eve is all about scam ppl, use them, steal from them, do everthing you cant do in RL. CCP support it. And here's something funny: For the high sec ganker, I can only say that it ...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.29 05:44:00
|
15. Suicidal ganks CCP do something about it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ridley Scot on 28/09/2007 16:07:31 Sorry for your lose, but as it is CCP is approving this. They consider high sec suicide tactics a valid game mechanics. There is no way to prevent this, and the only thing to do is stop hauling o...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.28 16:07:00
|
16. We the undersigned protest suicide ganking and request changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cornucopian Originally by: Ridley Scot go make a good movie again. You are infinitely better at movies then at forumwhorage. Freighters do NOT need a change, since they can protect themselves any number ...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.27 21:32:00
|
17. We the undersigned protest suicide ganking and request changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy So you basically conceed that you know nothing about highsec mechanics and know nothing about what ccp intended yet you like to spout bull**** about what you think ccp intended. And when proven wrong, you post som...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.27 21:19:00
|
18. We the undersigned protest suicide ganking and request changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy Originally by: Ridley Scot This is how I see this game and issue with high sec ganking. Game has three areas, and we all know what low sec and 0.0 space are for. High sec is an area of the game, a "nursery" ...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.27 21:04:00
|
19. We the undersigned protest suicide ganking and request changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ridley Scot on 27/09/2007 20:52:56 Edited by: Ridley Scot on 27/09/2007 20:51:34 This is how I see this game and issue with high sec ganking. Game has three areas, and we all know what low sec and 0.0 space are for. High sec is ...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.27 20:49:00
|
20. We the undersigned protest suicide ganking and request changes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gandolf LOL @ this thread p.s go play wow if u want no risk Irony is strong in this one.... Is that why you scan each ship before the ganking? Just because you dont want to risk? Solution is very easy, Concord should...
- by Ridley Scot - at 2007.09.27 18:29:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |